Here's my unfiltered take on Romney's progress to date in the primaries and the issues at stake - for submission to the Skidmore News as an opinion piece - hope they take it ... everybody, feel free to comment!
2 Comments
Here is the E. Shapiro treatment of the 20th Century's Presidents and how they made things happen - courtesy of Professor Seyb's class on the Presidency ... from the final exam ...
Here's my insight on Richard Nixon's domestic policy - his efforts seem liberal only by comparison to current times ... truly he earned his name "Tricky Dick" ... from Professor Delton's class ... Fall 2011
Check out the new apartment in Saratoga - quite a contrast from the London days ... and by the way, here is a collection of pix from last semester (sigh!) in London
Check out my thoughts on Teddy Roosevelt and the development of Liberalism, and his contrast with Woodrow Wilson and Taft ... for Professor Delton's class Fall 2011.
Here is my latest ranting, this time (loosely) on the topic of gay marriage. Let me know what you think ...
Conservatives love to praise themselves for being in touch with human nature. But when homosexuality is concerned, the realism goes out the window. All of a sudden, they start obsessing over the supposed dangers that homosexuality poses, none of them at all tangible. Their most ridiculous argument against gay marriage is that homosexual parents harm their children’s psychosexual development. Discounting a lack of compelling evidence, this contradicts their support of marriage in almost all cases, no matter how heinous the circumstances. If a husband abuses his wife, no big deal. If they cheat on each other, sure it’s a sin, but still, the marriage must go on. Hell, even verbal arguments can be immensely damaging. Yet, for some reason, being “exposed” to a loving, committed homosexual couple is prohibitively damaging. Even if it’s true that a traditional heterosexual marriage is the best thing for a child’s development (and this is by no means as certain as gay marriage opponent would have you believe), since when do we live in an ideal world? Divorce is rampant, which social conservatives claim is another sign of society’s impending descent into cultural ruin, yet the prospect of less broken homes is somehow superceded by the possibility that heterosexual marriages might be better for children? And also, how many traditional couples are actually in line with social conservatives’ rigid conception of gender roles. I don’t deny that these gender roles, like all stereotypes, could have some basis in reality. Perhaps there is a certain broad pattern of interaction in heterosexual couples that could influence a child’s development (although family structures in matriarchal societies pose a strong argument to the contrary). But in today’s society, these standards barely apply. Social conservatives highly overestimate the unique characteristics of paternal and maternal parenting roles. Before feminism, these roles may have been more prevalent, but that was for social, not biological reasons. If societal norms dictate a certain child-rearing blueprint, then reality will naturally reflect it to some extent. All of this suggests that even if the social conservatives assertions regarding unique maternal and paternal roles have a grain of truth to them, there is no reason why they should dwarf all other considerations in assessing the value of a marriage. Writing and posting from London - note my take on contemporary British Politics - here's a link to thoughts on Margaret Thatcher ... from Contemporary British Politics class at U. London Goldsmiths ...
A work in progress - my first draft of my middle east Mid-Term, laying out an anaylsis of mid-east affairs ...
Check out this posting on the threat of the Lionfish in domestic waters ... from New York Press 7/15/2010 ... the "Final Solution" to the Lionfish problem!
The latest in the absurd "boycott Israel" wars from my New York Press/CityArts blog posting on 7/12/2010 ...
|